Just thought I'd clarify that in case readers don't understand why that line has become the take-away from last night's debates. (Just watched Piers Morgan repeatedly not getting "it")
Atheism and secular living from a woman's point of view.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Greetings from my Binder
When I send my resume to a potential employer, I don't want to be in a "women's" binder. I want to be in the binder with everybody else who meets the minimum qualifications for the job I've applied for. And then, I want my resume to stay there and duke it out with the other resumes and not be tossed into the circular file (or the "NO" binder?) just for being a woman's resume. I don't want my potential employer to say, okay we've got five white men, now let's grab the women's binder, the Hispanic binder, the Asian binder, the black binder and the disabled binder and find some token hires.
Just thought I'd clarify that in case readers don't understand why that line has become the take-away from last night's debates. (Just watched Piers Morgan repeatedly not getting "it")
Just thought I'd clarify that in case readers don't understand why that line has become the take-away from last night's debates. (Just watched Piers Morgan repeatedly not getting "it")
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I usually choose "rather not say" for race and gender on applications. I always think a little affirmative action is going on.
Us white men can't catch a break. ;-)
Those questions are for reporting to the EEO the percentage of applicants in each category. Then if there's a complaint they have their track record to point to. So if they have 80% white men applying for the job, someone who complains that "only" white men get hired won't have a case if it turns out that 75-85% or so of applicants are white men and 80% of hires are white men. Conversely, if they have 50% women applying and 90% men getting the job, they may be in trouble if they're sued. In most correctly run places, they collect that information separately from the application itself.
You think you're bright, huh? Brighter than God?? Then, tell me, girly, why-O-why did God allow U.S. to have hairs on our fingers? Precisely because we evolved through the kindnessNgratitude of our Father. Cannot have it just Creationism nor can you just have evolutionism. They MUST go together, just like our attitude toward our existence seeing as that at death's hour, our indelible soul wisesabove --- Lemme give you a few thoughts which shall influence U.S. to reach for Utopia no matter what the cost: FOUR!! blogs which tell of the exxxcitement Heaven Above has to offer, which is an eternity of pleasure-beyond-measure; we ROTE {theeyebeam} to show a true story about sex in Heaven after we croak (apparently, most of U.S. are completely unaware of this fact). C'mon, people. The Liar's a deceiver: absolutely no sex in Hell amid the flames, filth and fuglyness, yet, puh-lenty of sssEX! Upstairs for those who want some. And why not?? Doesn’t God say anything and everything’s possible?? Yeah. Think so. God bless you. Meet me Upstairs where you’ll be 17 and I will be 21 for the length and breadth of eternity - won’t that be far beyond awesome rather than where the explosive oBOMBma wants to lead U.S.?? --- ‘God only gives bawls to those who see the need for humility’ -blessed holy socks
Post a Comment